Comments on: Harry Potter and The Goblet of Confusion

By: Jeffrey Goblets

Jeffrey Goblets — Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:32:05 +0000

The only thing I realy like is the special affects in Harry Potter and the Goblets of fire. Otherwise its all fantisy and just reminds me of magic trics I learned as a kid. Its hard for me to sit through the whole movie. Its a movie I wish had come out when I was a kid and still beleaved in magic.

By: jamie

jamie — Sun, 22 May 2011 16:10:50 +0000

ITS NOT LETING ME PLAY <3

By: WarAxe

WarAxe — Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:34:42 +0000

Some good analysis! I’m sure the books are deservedly as good as their popularity indicates… perhaps I’ll have to break my golden rule and read them instead of seeing the movie.

I registered with Blogger and haved commented on your blog. It has begun!

By: mahndisa

mahndisa — Mon, 20 Mar 2006 02:15:29 +0000

03 19 06

Interesting read. I didn’t see the last movie, although I want to. I have read the books and they stimulate the imagination. Usually movies are pale comparisons. And the book was like seven hundred pages long, so no wonder why the plots were difficult to follow. A lot happened in those seven hundred pages! To be sure, I always felt like JK Rowlings writing, although I am a fan, is a bit of a mixture of watered down Tolkien, CS Lewis and Roald Dahl. Harry’s living situation reeks of James and the Giant Peach’s and his wretched aunties. But one good thing about Ms, Rowling is her ability to simplifiy things and the fact that she had made an epic for many generations to come. And I had to disable anonymous comments because of trolls, but if you set up a Blogger acct, you can comment on whatever you wish.

My last post was kind of weird and I disabled comments on that for, well obvious reasons. Have a nice night:)