Comments on: A Matter of Days. http://negative99.com/reviews/a-matter-of-days/ An onslaught of expository excellence covering web design and development, politics and current events, faith and religion, guitar and music, programming... oh, and anything else. Thu, 24 May 2012 15:17:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Mike http://negative99.com/reviews/a-matter-of-days/comment-page-1/#comment-138673 Mike Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:47:46 +0000 http://www.negative99.com/archive/19#comment-138673 Over the years, I have picked up almost every book Hugh Ross has written. He shows compelling evidences of God's handiwork in nature agreeing with God's word. I highly recommend any of his books. Over the years, I have picked up almost every book Hugh Ross has written. He shows compelling evidences of God’s handiwork in nature agreeing with God’s word. I highly recommend any of his books.

]]> By: WarAxe http://negative99.com/reviews/a-matter-of-days/comment-page-1/#comment-15 WarAxe Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:20:37 +0000 http://www.negative99.com/archive/19#comment-15 You bring up some great points, Ron. Hugh Ross spends the Intoduction and First Chapter of his book talking about how controversial (and he stresses that it is needlessly so) this topic is within the Christian community. After having read recently some of what Ken Ham has said attacking Hugh Ross I find myself weary of Ham's website (even though I have found some good facts there). Thanks for your insights. :-) You bring up some great points, Ron. Hugh Ross spends the Intoduction and First Chapter of his book talking about how controversial (and he stresses that it is needlessly so) this topic is within the Christian community. After having read recently some of what Ken Ham has said attacking Hugh Ross I find myself weary of Ham’s website (even though I have found some good facts there).

Thanks for your insights. :-)

]]> By: Ron Mackey http://negative99.com/reviews/a-matter-of-days/comment-page-1/#comment-14 Ron Mackey Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:38:12 +0000 http://www.negative99.com/archive/19#comment-14 Hi Steve, Anne and I spent an evening chatting with Hugh Ross in our living room (back when we were in seminary). A very fascinating individual. He definitely expanded my thinking about the issues of origins. Can't say I buy all his conclusions, particularly his leaning toward theistic evolution. But, I have a lot of respect for the man and his ministry. His books are worth the read. It is unfortunate, I think, that the beleiving community inserts so much venom into this debate. If you visit Ken Ham's site (www.answersin genesis.org), or Institute for Creation Research (ww.icr.org) you can find a whole lot of critique. Of course, Ross is not shy about dishing it back. I am all for honest open and even passionate debate about these issues, but must it become a point of division in the body? Some think so. rwm Hi Steve, Anne and I spent an evening chatting with Hugh Ross in our living room (back when we were in seminary). A very fascinating individual. He definitely expanded my thinking about the issues of origins. Can’t say I buy all his conclusions, particularly his leaning toward theistic evolution. But, I have a lot of respect for the man and his ministry. His books are worth the read.

It is unfortunate, I think, that the beleiving community inserts so much venom into this debate. If you visit Ken Ham’s site (www.answersin genesis.org), or Institute for Creation Research (ww.icr.org) you can find a whole lot of critique. Of course, Ross is not shy about dishing it back. I am all for honest open and even passionate debate about these issues, but must it become a point of division in the body? Some think so.

rwm

]]>