Two Roses, One Flash

Rose (with flash) Rose (sans flash)

Do you see the two photographs above? They are both of a pinkish rose, one a light pink and the other a deep pink. There’s also some profound differences in the photos stemming from the fact that one was taken with a flash and one was not.

The one on the left was with a flash. The foreground of the light pink rose is well lit… it accentuates the glistening water droplets loitering on its petals. The background is very dark, and the setting appears to be sometime at night, well after sunset. The greenery is very dark and muted behind the bright flower, making for an uneasy contrast in depth and brightness.

The one on the right was taken without a flash (requiring a steady hand). This rose is a full, rich rouge-salmon of a pink… very deep in color compared to the unsaturated color on the other rose. The greenery here is a confidant hue and stands out quite clearly in the muted sunlight of what appears to be a cloudy morning with lingering due… say around 10:00 AM.

If you haven’t already guessed, this is the same rose. The pictures were taken from the same perspective. What you might not have guessed was the profound effect the flash would have on this photo… because, you see, they were not taken hours from each other.

Indeed, these two photographs were only taken 20 seconds apart! :-)

u comment i follow 7 Comments

  1. Posted August 31, 2007 at 7:13 pm | Permalink

    I’m waiting for the tie-in where you tell me that Liberals are idiots… Hmmm.

  2. Posted September 1, 2007 at 8:31 am | Permalink

    @ Rachael :: There’s always that potential. :-)

  3. Posted September 4, 2007 at 12:01 am | Permalink

    This is almost philosophical. It must have a deeper meaning.

  4. Posted September 6, 2007 at 8:44 pm | Permalink

    @ Mike :: Perhaps you could work it into one of your study groups and tell me what they come up with. :-)

  5. Benjamin
    Posted October 10, 2007 at 10:40 am | Permalink

    As somewhat of a photographer I always choose to photograph with natural light. No flash, I think it ruins pictures. Take it natural and if need be photohop it. ;)

  6. Posted December 16, 2008 at 10:06 pm | Permalink

    Interesting, I’m in to photography a bit myself (sorry if this is random, your blog came up in a google image search). I thought the two roses were different pictures, I’ll have to remember that nexttime I decide to on if I use the flash or not.

  7. christine
    Posted February 19, 2010 at 12:54 pm | Permalink

    nice site! thank you for giving your tips and idea. Very interesting, at first I thought two roses were different pictures..! I would try that one when taking pictures!..=)

u comment i followPost a Comment

Please observe these simple rules when leaving comments. Fill out your information truthfully - that means using either your REAL name or a "handle" of some sort (like Mr. Frizzy Monkey). Don't be vulgar or idiotic. If your comment seems to be made for link value, or for advertising your business, and not to contribute to the discussion then your comment will probably be edited or deleted. If any of your info seems fake your comment will probably be deleted. I apologize in advance for any well meaning comments that meet an untimely end... but I'm sure you'll understand and forgive me.

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*