Comments on: The Famous Leaked Photo http://negative99.com/jovial-cynicism/the-famous-leaked-photo/ An onslaught of expository excellence covering web design and development, politics and current events, faith and religion, guitar and music, programming... oh, and anything else. Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:50:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Negative99 » 09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0 http://negative99.com/jovial-cynicism/the-famous-leaked-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-37231 Negative99 » 09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0 Wed, 02 May 2007 12:26:44 +0000 http://www.negative99.com/archive/232#comment-37231 [...] like to share supposedly forbidden tidbits. Here was a previous one. This is a new one. 09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0. That may not look like much, [...] [...] like to share supposedly forbidden tidbits. Here was a previous one. This is a new one. 09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0. That may not look like much, [...]

]]> By: DaInfidelsInfidel http://negative99.com/jovial-cynicism/the-famous-leaked-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-1064 DaInfidelsInfidel Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:46:30 +0000 http://www.negative99.com/archive/232#comment-1064 I like this picture a lot. It reminds me of a Time or Life magazine picture of maybe one of JFKs kid (or even maybe Lucille Balls and Dezi Arnez's kids) from the 60s. I think someone took great effort to make it look that way. Definitely classy, definitely a deliberate leak. Either way, looks like American royalty. I especially like the Mr. and Mrs. Smith reference that makes it seem rather anonymous but hysterical at the same time. I like this picture a lot. It reminds me of a Time or Life magazine picture of maybe one of JFKs kid (or even maybe Lucille Balls and Dezi Arnez’s kids) from the 60s. I think someone took great effort to make it look that way. Definitely classy, definitely a deliberate leak.

Either way, looks like American royalty. I especially like the Mr. and Mrs. Smith reference that makes it seem rather anonymous but hysterical at the same time.

]]> By: WarAxe http://negative99.com/jovial-cynicism/the-famous-leaked-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-1052 WarAxe Thu, 08 Jun 2006 20:36:56 +0000 http://www.negative99.com/archive/232#comment-1052 Heather :: I think the wedding ring would be on the other finger. :-) But, as you know from your rumor blogs, there are stories brewing of upcoming nuptials. gnorb :: Actually, those are all really good points. I posted last night and should've thought to upload the pic somewhere else and hotlink it. <em>With a PR of 5, exposure through pinging (if you’re into that sort of thing), and a fairly high Alexa ranking, you’re not exactly under the radar.</em> Good point. I sometimes still have the illusion of invisibility. Mike :: You make me smile. :-) mark :: Hey, nice to see you droppin' by! And, yes, wasn't that a great movie! :-) Heather :: I think the wedding ring would be on the other finger. :-) But, as you know from your rumor blogs, there are stories brewing of upcoming nuptials.

gnorb :: Actually, those are all really good points. I posted last night and should’ve thought to upload the pic somewhere else and hotlink it.

With a PR of 5, exposure through pinging (if you’re into that sort of thing), and a fairly high Alexa ranking, you’re not exactly under the radar.

Good point. I sometimes still have the illusion of invisibility.

Mike :: You make me smile. :-)

mark :: Hey, nice to see you droppin’ by! And, yes, wasn’t that a great movie! :-)

]]> By: mark http://negative99.com/jovial-cynicism/the-famous-leaked-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-1048 mark Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:13:43 +0000 http://www.negative99.com/archive/232#comment-1048 Who are Mr. and Mrs. Smith? ;) Who are Mr. and Mrs. Smith?
;)

]]> By: Mike http://negative99.com/jovial-cynicism/the-famous-leaked-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-1047 Mike Thu, 08 Jun 2006 15:40:07 +0000 http://www.negative99.com/archive/232#comment-1047 Now that's gutsy journalism... :-) Now that’s gutsy journalism… :-)

]]> By: gnorb http://negative99.com/jovial-cynicism/the-famous-leaked-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-1045 gnorb Thu, 08 Jun 2006 14:48:06 +0000 http://www.negative99.com/archive/232#comment-1045 Regarding lawyers: Seeing as I've been on both sides of the "law" on this one, I recommend that you maybe either (1) host the picture somewhere else and link it here, or (2) at least call it something other than "leakedpicture", which may be -- for the short run, at least until the next leaking of celeb photos, or about a week -- a tempting term to search for, and given the topical nature of Google's search algorithim (if something's hot in the news it'll get pushed up for a short while), it's not all that unthinkable that this'll get picked up within a day, depending on how often Google spiders yuour site. (The first option is much more secure for you than the second.) The reason for the concern is, of course, Google Images. Hosting the image somewhere else will generally stop that image from showing up linked to this site in a Google Image Search. Yes, I know, what are the chances, right? (Slim to none, I know.) Then again, I am a paranoid little monkey when it comes to this sort of thing. Part of my job description at one point was to hunt down stuff like this. With a PR of 5, exposure through pinging (if you're into that sort of thing), and a fairly high Alexa ranking, you're not exactly under the radar. That said, the article is obfuscated enough to divert more than a few lookers, but all it takes is the wrong one. Regarding lawyers: Seeing as I’ve been on both sides of the “law” on this one, I recommend that you maybe either (1) host the picture somewhere else and link it here, or (2) at least call it something other than “leakedpicture”, which may be — for the short run, at least until the next leaking of celeb photos, or about a week — a tempting term to search for, and given the topical nature of Google’s search algorithim (if something’s hot in the news it’ll get pushed up for a short while), it’s not all that unthinkable that this’ll get picked up within a day, depending on how often Google spiders yuour site. (The first option is much more secure for you than the second.) The reason for the concern is, of course, Google Images. Hosting the image somewhere else will generally stop that image from showing up linked to this site in a Google Image Search.

Yes, I know, what are the chances, right? (Slim to none, I know.) Then again, I am a paranoid little monkey when it comes to this sort of thing. Part of my job description at one point was to hunt down stuff like this. With a PR of 5, exposure through pinging (if you’re into that sort of thing), and a fairly high Alexa ranking, you’re not exactly under the radar. That said, the article is obfuscated enough to divert more than a few lookers, but all it takes is the wrong one.

]]> By: Heather http://negative99.com/jovial-cynicism/the-famous-leaked-photo/comment-page-1/#comment-1044 Heather Thu, 08 Jun 2006 10:28:56 +0000 http://www.negative99.com/archive/232#comment-1044 wow, even with all the gossip blogs i read, this is the first i've heard of it! good work! and... is that a wedding ring on his finger?!?! wow, even with all the gossip blogs i read, this is the first i’ve heard of it! good work! and… is that a wedding ring on his finger?!?!

]]>