State

Steve wearing STATE shirt

State of Global Warming

Ha! It’s hard to believe anyone is still taking this seriously, but for those keeping score at home - it now appears that in addition to cowsmoose are contributing to global warming more than automobiles?! You can’t make this stuff up. Some braintrust of researchers in Norway are concerned that moose are belching and tooting the environment into potential catastrophe. This instantly conjures scores of pointed questions targeting the validity of the research and the sanity of the researchers, not to mention the dubious scientific conclusions.

One question I might ask is… then why is it also getting warmer on Mars? Are moose belching there, too? And why does your comparison regarding the larger carbon footprint of a moose, compared to a car, lead you to the conclusion that moose are even a BIGGER threat… rather than the conclusion that, “Oh, maybe cars aren’t doing as much as we thought.” And why haven’t we seen the effect from moose before now… because surely with all of man’s atrocious macho-paternalistic pillaging of the world’s natural habitats wouldn’t there logically be FEWER moose today than there used to be? And better yet, how are the PETA crazies going to take this… do we wickedly hunt down and eat these tasty yet evil beasts of voluminous anal gas?… or do we honor their natural existence as it starts to boil the oceans?

See… it’s those Catch-22’s that make it so hard being on the left.

State of Sports

It’s great when the highlights of every major sportscast right now includes footage of Michael Vick. Actually that’s not great. Actually it’s a horrid picture of the journalistic sensationalism that consistently manages to displace actual news with repetitive drivel. And doesn’t it warm your heart to know that organizing dog fights is yet another act society scorns more than the plunging of cold steel into the base of a baby’s skull?

State of the Blog Spam

82,382 spam comments blocked… and counting.

State of the Blog Design

This may not mean much to some… but the new design will be a labor of progressive enhancement. So basically, I’m going to put up a new design that will function adequately and will look different… but will not be in its final state, nor will it have any bells and whistles. After I begin this process I will be tweaking the design over the next few weeks to “tune” it to what I want. This is in contrast to the usual design reboot that most sites do where the entire design is completed in a sandbox environment and deployed immediately in a near-finished state.

State of the Prison System

As much as the geographic snobs here in the Northeast love to snoot their beaks at anyone with a southern twang (which to us is everyone from Pennsylvania down), I can’t help but be reminded that folks down south got themselves a better way of gettin’er done. Take this story about a jail in South Carolina that is making inmates who sexually misbehave wear a pink jumpsuit for three months of their “stay”. I love that idea. I love every part of it. Here you got these inmates who are exposing themselves (and worse) to female prison guards… and the prison has thought up a very clever way of “marking” them as the deviants they are for the rest to see. Shame. Shame - used appropriately - is a great thing.

Of course, there’s a lawsuit against making inmates wear the pink jumpsuit. This lawsuit was filed by a current inmate serving time for assault & battery with intent to kill… and he thinks wearing a pink jumpsuit will unfairly “label” him and cause others to make derisive comments. [cue the violins] Somehow I don’t feel sorry for this felon… and somehow I don’t feel sorry for a criminal being shamed for acting like an animal. In fact, if anything, it blows my mind that inmates can expose themselves and throw semen on female guards without fear of punishment… and even in “progressive” South Carolina. Holy smokes… how in NASCAR’s name do inmates get away with that to begin with?

I mean seriously… let’s say an inmate throws a urine/feces mixture (which is common) on a female prison guard - you would/should whack them with your nightstick. If they do it again (for whatever insanely idiotic reason) you would/should whack them twice… and they do it a third time and you whack’em thrice… and so on and so on… you get the idea. Logically the greater the pain inflicted by strikes with a nightstick the less “attractive” the urine/feces throwing becomes. And again, logically the more severe and numerous the nightstick strikes the greater time will pass between urine/feces throwing events. One could even postulate that there is a critical number of nightstick whacks that would preclude any repeat urine/feces throwing events for the remainder of their sentence.

Now, the above reads a little totalitarian with a dash of sadistic fascism… and a pity it does. But it certainly puts the pink uniform in a better context. And we can only wish for the day when they’ll bring back the stocks.

u comment i follow 9 Comments

  1. Posted August 22, 2007 at 5:17 pm | Permalink

    Actually, I think the urine/feces throwing should be an automatic entrance into a week and a half of solitary confinement. Not to mention a forced overdose on Immodium.

  2. Posted August 23, 2007 at 10:35 pm | Permalink

    @ Rachael :: Yeah, I agree. It still confounds me that in a place of punishment there’s not sufficient controls on prisoner behavior. I guess I have the ACLU to thank for that.

  3. Heather
    Posted August 24, 2007 at 5:17 am | Permalink

    why not try a holiday in sweden this year? See the majestic moose?

  4. capo
    Posted August 25, 2007 at 9:35 am | Permalink

    Ah, but you miss the point, my evil right wing friend - they’re not considered to be places of punishment. That’s why they’re called “correctional” institutes. I don’t know what the stats are on how unsuccessful that premise might be, but I’d guess fewer than 1 in 10 serious offenders actually end up being “corrected” before they’re released to try again. Then again, when are real world results ever allowed to have any influence on well-meaning social programs? If they go awry, it just means that they don’t have enough funding.

  5. Posted August 31, 2007 at 2:41 pm | Permalink

    @ Heather :: I’ll have to be sure to not light any open flames near the back of the moose. Sweden would be sweet, though.

    @ capo :: “If they go awry, it just means that they don’t have enough funding.” Oh boy, isn’t that the truth, though? How many times have we heard that… about everything! “Correctional” facilities, schools, welfare, health care. Just throw money at it and it’ll be better. Oops… I mean just throw SUCCESSFUL people’s money at it, because their success was from cheating, of course.

    Can you imagine suggesting the same tactic with regard to Iraq, or the military in general, Catholic priest controversies, Republican homosexuality, yada yada yada…

  6. Posted November 28, 2007 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    What a great way to avoid responsibility for Global Warming, and I’ll bet it’s not just the mooses (meeses? plural) tooting, but all those dang hedgehogs, also.

  7. Ken
    Posted December 11, 2008 at 12:32 pm | Permalink

    Here is a story appearing on the WIVB newscast from Buffalo on the EPA’s proposed gas tax on cows.

    http://www.wivb.com/dpp/news/gas_tax_on_cows_20081210

  8. Posted December 11, 2008 at 10:39 pm | Permalink

    @Ken
    ARGH!!! How stupid can people get? The EPA should all be burned alive! (Carbon emissions I can believe in!)

    I love how they say taxing farmers is a means to “control the animal’s methane emissions”!?! WTF!!! Like the cow is going to fart less if its owner is taxed! This is asinine in the most idiotic of ways. It’s purely a means of artificially making dairy and beef farming more expensive, so that farmers costs increase… so that prices increase. So ultimately the EPA will be taking money away from citizens who consume dairy and beef.

    Boy do I hate these people. Don’t they realize yet that this is a farce?! Check this out: LINK

  9. gladi8or-666
    Posted December 12, 2008 at 8:12 am | Permalink

    we, the humans screwed up the world, NOT ANIMALS!!!

    an thats a lot of spam, if it was the food SPAM, my dad would be a happy camper. :)

u comment i followPost a Comment

Please observe these simple rules when leaving comments. Fill out your information truthfully - that means using either your REAL name or a "handle" of some sort (like Mr. Frizzy Monkey). Don't be vulgar or idiotic. If your comment seems to be made for link value, or for advertising your business, and not to contribute to the discussion then your comment will probably be edited or deleted. If any of your info seems fake your comment will probably be deleted. I apologize in advance for any well meaning comments that meet an untimely end... but I'm sure you'll understand and forgive me.

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*