Sit back… this may get preachy! For my non-Christian readers, this could go totally over your head, yet it may be very pertinent to you where you are in your spiritual journey. For my Christian readers, just know that I prayerfully ruminated on this for weeks before deciding to blog it. I encourage all to read and use your minds.
The following message from Pastor Stan Key was printed on the front of the Worship Guide on January 15th, 2006, for Loudonville Community Church (LCC):
When I was growing up, churches seemed to compete with one another in an effort to be “holier than thou.” But the game has now changed. It seems the competition among churches today is centered on the effort to be “trendier than thou.”
Our praise band is better than yours… Our jumbotron screens are bigger… Our services are more seeker-friendly… Our pastor is cooler… Our ministry is edgier… Our cappuccino lattés between services are frothier…
The temptation to be relevant is great. But it is a temptation. In a desire to reach the unreached, the seduction is strong to think that newer is truer, later is greater, and bigger is better. We begin to actually believe that we must marry the spirit of the age in order to have an impact. Dean Inge captured the false allure of such thinking in his celebrated line, “He who marries the spirit of the age soon becomes a widower.”
Jesus saw through such seduction. The devil tempted him to turn stones to bread. “Give people what they want,” he seemed to hiss. But Jesus did not take the bait. Thank God! Man does not live by bread alone. He looked beyond our wants and saw our need.
The race to be trendier-than-thou is self-defeating. Not only does the church who falls into this seduction become guilty of what C. S. Lewis calls “chronological snobbery,” but this is the surest path a church can take to cultural irrelevance! The passion to be up-to-date is the surest recipe for becoming out-of-date. A church whose main purpose is to be “cutting-edge” will soon become either inconsequential or a place where a “different gospel” is preached. Years ago, Simone Weil said it well: “To be always relevant, you have to say things which are eternal.” I am slowly learning that the best way to be “cutting edge” is to be “retro.” Preach the Word. Study the Bible. Love your neighbor. Confess your sins. Do this, and many will wonder what you are up to! It is the things that make us different from the world that makes the Gospel attractive.
As your pastor, I want you to know that I am deeply committed to being counter-cultural. When people accuse me of being oldfashioned and out-of-step with contemporary trends, I say, “Thank you for the complement.” The only way I know to be truly “cutting-edge” is to preach the full Gospel of Jesus Christ! Let’s recommit ourselves to being in the world…but not of it!
Pastor Stan
A little background… our local newspaper, the Albany Times Union, had just coincidentally (or not so) featured a BIG front page spread on two other churches in the area, Northway Fellowship and Grace Fellowship. The article, titled Reconciling Religion and Relevance, praised these two “modern” churches for shedding many tired traditions of men and embracing cultural relevance. These two churches also happen to have thriving praise and worship ministries. The article boiled down to this… the Gospel message delivered in a relevant vehicle and mixed with a solid worship ministry was a recipe for church growth and cultural outreach.
On matters of style, swim with the current, on matters of principle, stand like a rock.
- Thomas Jefferson
I don’t believe it was a mere coincidence that Pastor Stan’s message, suggesting relevance is a temptation, appeared just after the article Reconciling Religion and Relevance was published. Indeed, his message seems to be a counter-point to this article. But unlike the churches in the article, LCC is not currently marked by sharp growth, nor a thriving worship ministry, so it’s hard not to think Grace and Northway aren’t being specifically targeted since they match the description Pastor Stan gives so well… they have better worship teams, edgier ministries, seeker-friendlier services, and at least one, in fact, serves cappuccino lattés between services (and they’re as tasty as they are frothy).
Nobody can deny that sacrificing sound Biblical doctrine in order to achieve some kind of über-current, super-relevant, contemporary church is definitely wrong. What I will deny is that a church has to sacrifice scriptural truth to be culturally relevant. It doesn’t. They aren’t even related. Some churches are both relevant and scriptural… some are just one of those… and some are neither.
In essentials, unity; in non-essentials, diversity; in all things, charity.
- Augustine
I don’t think anybody would argue against the case for a church being scriptural, but what about being relevant? Is relevance a temptation? Let me ask you this… how can you reach people if you aren’t relevant? We are all in this culture, like it or not. We’re all part of our society, be it as it may. We can lock ourselves in our steepled buildings and thank the Lord that we’re not like other people… or we can be Christ-like and start affecting people where they are. After preaching in the synagogues Jesus would go preach in the streets… and then go into the houses of the “un-churched” and eat and drink wine with them.
There may be some in today’s church who will read Pastor Stan’s message and take it to an extreme… they may take it as a green light for us to choose our favorite moment in time (usually the 1950’s or the 18th century) and lock ourselves, our praise, our message, our language, and our minds in that time period. Indeed, if you look around at today’s churches this is the norm. Talk about “chronological snobbery”! Somehow I don’t think being caught in a time-warp is going to draw non-time-travelers to the cross. How would it? We’re not going to reach people if we refuse to use the communication vehicles of their culture. I remember stories of early missionaries to some of the most remote mountain villages in the Eastern hemisphere… where Western pipe organs would be hauled at great expense to the newly established churches so that they could worship the “right way” with the “right songs”. People to this day still swear that the King James Bible (written in a language no longer spoken) is the only so-called God-breathed English Bible translation. Can you imagine?
If self-righteousness were an art form, many Protestants’ work would be in the Guggenheim!
- Brad Stine, Being a Christian Without Being an Idiot
NEWS FLASH: Right now… it’s now. It used to be then, but we passed then. We’re at now, now. As Christians, living now, we’re called to be relevant. We are here to affect our communities, and we can’t do that if we aren’t using the styles and communication vehicles of the culture. But why wouldn’t we do that in the first place? What so possesses a Christian to discard their own present-day styles? These are our styles, too! Yet, there still exist in today’s churches (in surprising numbers) “chronological snobs” who insist that sacred hymns put to centuries old tunes (tunes which have passed out of musical relevance) are the epitomy of true Biblical praise and worship… while those same hymn lyrics put to modern, relevant musical arrangements are discounted as attempts at being trendier-than-thou. Some even claim that the new arrangements are sinful, and even pornographic?!
I’m worried that some “chronoligical snobs” might read Pastor Stan’s message and see it as Biblical justification for their snobbery. Indeed, it’s hard not to read it any other way… and I was fairly concerned with the fact that he didn’t have anything good to say about relevance. A Wesleyan I work with thought it sounded like a classic bait-and-switch… using the fear of compromising sound doctrine to justify cultural reclusion. Unfortunately, that interpretation is pretty much how it reads.
relevant - adjective :: applicable, pertinent, material, significant, directly related and connected to the subject, object or issue
antonyms :: irrelevant, extraneous, immaterial, inapplicable, inconsequential, insignificant, unimportant, meaningless, pointless, senseless, useless, inappropriate, inapt, unsuitable
Sources :: Answers.com and Wiktionary
We need to preach the Word, study the Bible, and love our neighbors, and we need to do these in a deliberate, relevant, culturally effectual way… else we’ve done them in vain. Pastor Stan is right to implore us to let nothing compromise scripture and the Gospel message, but I am saddened to see relevance (in style and trend) being seemingly confused with the compromise of sound Biblical doctrine. I know that both can be embraced… and I know this because it was Christ’s example.
Good links: Relevant Magazine :: Acts 29 Network
Great read: Radical Reformission

Web designer and developer. Loud discerner. Software engineer and 
NAIL…
HEAD….
You hit it! Amen, Brother!
Interesting Blog … good stuff. Please allow me some observations
Whenever the post modern church speaks about the modern church, they jump right to the extreme to make a point - boring monotone hymns. Whenever the modern church speaks about the post modern church, they likewise, jump right to the extreme - compromising God’s Word in order to be trendy. It’s human nature I guess, but the heart of the matter dwells well within the extremes I think.
I agree with modern worship. I agree with the coffee shop inside my church. I don’t agree with Pastor’s discussing their favorite alcoholic beverage with a group of people. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with at least a skeleton of a dress code inside a church (or at least the sanctuary).
So where do I fit in? Am I post modern, or modern? Am I only partially relevant?
I guess, for me, the only thing about the post modern church that I DON’T like … is the fact that “they” felt it necessary to rename themselves, destroying the very unity they claim to be embracing. If a Pastor, or church leadership decides it time to make a few changes for the better, great! But don’t rename yourself (the emerging church) and draw a line in the sand - only to ask people to become a part of their “better” church.
See what I mean? anyway … just some thoughts.
milo
labels labels and more labels…. is that what we’ve sunk too? The only label I will put any stock in is the one on the front of the book “The Holy Bible”. My life has been spent in labeled churches and I have seen it all go bad at one point or another because of those labels which everyone HAS to have. How many denominations and sub denominations do we need or can we invent?? Teach, learn and live from the Bible, GOD’S word not some multi-denominationally (cool word, could be a new denomination, huh?) group of people.
Wow, good thoughts from all. I, too, weary from labels. In fact here’s a blog entry I made from a discussion I was having on Alissa’s blog about whether or not her church was emergent. I ranted (not on her church,obviously) on the extremes of either side.
Someone will always bring up in a hipper church, “are we emergent?” And of course everyone else will always reply “what’s emergent?”
Great question… because the more you read about emergent churches the more confused you get.
I included the link for EmergentChurch.org because the emergent church movement is definitely an example of trying to be relevant. If we compare that to a “modern” church in this area, we’ll say Grace Fellowship… they are (imho) decidedly NOT emergent, but are still seeking to be relevant (from what I see and from what my fellow believers who attend tell me).
Hmm… perhaps modern and post-modern/emergent are almost “flavors” of what the church should be - sound doctrine delivered in a relevant vehicle and always seeking to be like Christ.
But alas, look at me speaking in labels.
As was said, it really is pretty simple. There exists ONE body… with more fragmentation and multi-denominationalism
than any other entity I think in all of history!
I had a conversation with a Methodist chaplain one time. I told him how I grew up Legalis– I mean Baptist, but that I would rather just call myself a follower of Christ and dispose of any man-made label or denomination. To which this dope discounted me by attributing my label-rebellion to me being one of today’s disenfranchised (and disinterested) youth. He was truly a Kool-Aid drinker.
Someone very wise recently pointed out to me that a major pitfall often espoused in “emergentness” (since we can’t call it “emergency”) or many other churches is a maximization of discontinuity with the past. Unscriptural and immature.
Dunno what that has to do with anything but I felt like pointing it out.
Good insight. Funny, in cross-cultural ministries we do everything we can to be culturally relevant, and no one questions our commitment to the Gospel message.
alissa :: It almost seems like the über-modern churches are more trying to completely seperate from the past than emerging churches… while the emerging churches are bringing back some older traditions like weekly communion and incense, etc. I dunno…
BA’s right… too many labels.
Mike :: You’ll appreciate this story which took place about six years ago. A young man in Loudonville grew up in the church and went on to become a missionary to India, learning the language and studying the music. He came back to Loudonville to talk to us about ethnomusicology and the importance of Indian believers praising God using the styles of their culture. He said before the people could truly worship they needed to be singing praise songs written in their own cultural style. Our youth pastor then leans over to one of the youth and whispers with a smile, “Hey, we should do that here.”
I just stumbled on this blog today and I was pleasantly surprised to read alll the comments, the hearts that you all display seem to be for the same thing an unadulterated, relevant my generation gospel.
Just like it’s author the Church should “be the same yesterday, today and forever” but to not move with the times we are in would be death to the christian faith. the same yesterday, today and forever is like this, when I was first born I was named Martin Beckett, and there is something unique about me, that defines who I am, now over the years my outward appearence has changed with time, I have dressed to suit the era I am in my hair style is new and trendy but I am still the same person that I was born to be.
Providing the Church keeps the message the same and speaks the whole truth of the Kingdom, who cares what they look like?
Pastor Marty
One Trackback
[...] “Reaching Out Without Selling Out” is the tagline for this tome of relevancy. And indeed, being relevant (and theologically sound) is what makes modern missions effective (see my previous post on relevance). If ever there was an instruction manual on how to be a Christ-follower carrying out the great commission right where you are… surely this is it! Most of our present approaches to reach the world fail… and we need a radical change in how we share the truth to reach our post-Christian culture. That radical change is what Driscoll calls “reformission”. We are all on a mission with Jesus everyday, and we are either good missionaries or bad. [...]