Comments on: Change we can believe in – for the unborn?

By: step by step directions

step by step directions — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:38:04 +0000

“Christ called us to love, help, and protect the “least of these”… and none are more “least” than the unborn – innocent, fragile, voiceless.”

The “least of these” would also include insects then? Except, of course, when the list is only exclusive to humans. But is the mass of blood called blastocyst already a human? Before I could agree with your stand on abortion, I still have to clarify first the definition of human.

By: Namp

Namp — Sat, 30 May 2009 12:14:11 +0000

Spong never fails to shake me up profoundly, and it was the combination of my neo-Paganism, wondering what a neo-Christian might be

By: Dieta

Dieta — Wed, 20 May 2009 13:29:29 +0000

Yeah, Rachel is right. Those people are just too lazy or affraid of doing something about the things they supposedly belive in.

By: The Siberian Grinder » 100 Days of Change

The Siberian Grinder » 100 Days of Change — Mon, 04 May 2009 19:45:43 +0000

[...] HT: Steve Mooradian [...]

By: WarAxe

WarAxe — Sat, 02 May 2009 02:38:45 +0000

The people (in our church!?) who avoid civic duty are not wolves in sheep’s clothing, though, Steve.

I agree, and I never said otherwise, although I just tweaked some words for clarity.

By: Rachel

Rachel — Sat, 02 May 2009 01:11:02 +0000

The people (in our church!?) who avoid civic duty are not wolves in sheep’s clothing, though, Steve. They just have comfort zones that they don’t want to leave, and risks they refuse to take. They ALONE will have to answer to God for their action or inaction. And the Holy Spirit ALONE will have to convict them.