<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe MAX 2007 &#8211; Wrapup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://negative99.com/electrons/adobe-max-2007-wrapup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://negative99.com/electrons/adobe-max-2007-wrapup/</link>
	<description>An onslaught of expository excellence covering web design and development, politics and current events, faith and religion, guitar and music, programming... oh, and anything else.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 03:21:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mom</title>
		<link>http://negative99.com/electrons/adobe-max-2007-wrapup/comment-page-1/#comment-77823</link>
		<dc:creator>Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 04:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negative99.com/archive/341#comment-77823</guid>
		<description>Some of us (not divorced) women are proud of our grown children&#039;s high paying jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of us (not divorced) women are proud of our grown children&#8217;s high paying jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://negative99.com/electrons/adobe-max-2007-wrapup/comment-page-1/#comment-74035</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 22:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negative99.com/archive/341#comment-74035</guid>
		<description>Ha.  I didn&#039;t read this prior to the edit.  But it&#039;s amusing that somebody might think you were cruising the female attendees.  Amusing to me.  I&#039;m sure not to everyone.  Not that I endorse that kind of thing.  

We have to play some Magic.  If I wait much longer, I&#039;m just going to make another deck and I think 11 is already a bit much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha.  I didn&#8217;t read this prior to the edit.  But it&#8217;s amusing that somebody might think you were cruising the female attendees.  Amusing to me.  I&#8217;m sure not to everyone.  Not that I endorse that kind of thing.  </p>
<p>We have to play some Magic.  If I wait much longer, I&#8217;m just going to make another deck and I think 11 is already a bit much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ripley[NLM]</title>
		<link>http://negative99.com/electrons/adobe-max-2007-wrapup/comment-page-1/#comment-73886</link>
		<dc:creator>Ripley[NLM]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 04:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negative99.com/archive/341#comment-73886</guid>
		<description>Is this the support page for that paintball mod for that Quake game? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the support page for that paintball mod for that Quake game? <img src='http://negative99.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capo</title>
		<link>http://negative99.com/electrons/adobe-max-2007-wrapup/comment-page-1/#comment-73600</link>
		<dc:creator>capo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negative99.com/archive/341#comment-73600</guid>
		<description>Hah :-) You&#039;re much more observant than me. I never notice rings, hair, clothes.... Jewelry of any type has to be pretty ostentatious (or unusually attractive) before I notice it. But I&#039;d be quick to check out what phone, laptop, PDA or MP3 player they had. Same deal when my wife and I are watching some musical act on TV. She&#039;ll comment on their hair, their clothes, their sleazy half-dressed background singers... I&#039;ll be saying stuff like &quot;yup, all SM58 Betas. And that&#039;s a Taylor 314CE. Looks like the drummer is sub-mixing through an old Mackie 1604...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah <img src='http://negative99.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  You&#8217;re much more observant than me. I never notice rings, hair, clothes&#8230;. Jewelry of any type has to be pretty ostentatious (or unusually attractive) before I notice it. But I&#8217;d be quick to check out what phone, laptop, PDA or MP3 player they had. Same deal when my wife and I are watching some musical act on TV. She&#8217;ll comment on their hair, their clothes, their sleazy half-dressed background singers&#8230; I&#8217;ll be saying stuff like &#8220;yup, all SM58 Betas. And that&#8217;s a Taylor 314CE. Looks like the drummer is sub-mixing through an old Mackie 1604&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WarAxe</title>
		<link>http://negative99.com/electrons/adobe-max-2007-wrapup/comment-page-1/#comment-73580</link>
		<dc:creator>WarAxe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negative99.com/archive/341#comment-73580</guid>
		<description>@ capo :: Okay, I edited my post to better reflect why I thought the women were divorced... thanks for pointing it out.  :-)  I actually didn&#039;t hear one woman say she was divorced, but more than half (by anecdotal observation) of attending women were &gt;40, wore no &quot;rings&quot;, yet during conversation found ways to bring up their children (at times bragging about their grown childrens&#039; high-paying jobs).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ capo :: Okay, I edited my post to better reflect why I thought the women were divorced&#8230; thanks for pointing it out.  <img src='http://negative99.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   I actually didn&#8217;t hear one woman say she was divorced, but more than half (by anecdotal observation) of attending women were >40, wore no &#8220;rings&#8221;, yet during conversation found ways to bring up their children (at times bragging about their grown childrens&#8217; high-paying jobs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capo</title>
		<link>http://negative99.com/electrons/adobe-max-2007-wrapup/comment-page-1/#comment-73562</link>
		<dc:creator>capo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.negative99.com/archive/341#comment-73562</guid>
		<description>Sounds like the Novell conference I used to attend every year (Brainshare) although I never asked any of the females about their marital status. :-) I&#039;m not an Adobe user, but I get to repackage their apps every year for campus distribution and I have two complaints (no, three):
1. Adobe is the undisputed king of bloatware. Even MS takes second place.
2. Their apps are extremely unfriendly to those of us who have to do &quot;enterprise installs&quot;, although to their credit, that&#039;s begun to change a bit with CS3. They&#039;re finally beginning to allow XML scripted silent installs and with a little tweaking I can even swap out keyed versions of the actual .exe&#039;s in the installer.
3. their tech support, though not the worst, is also far from being the best. I&#039;ve had at least two instances in the past few months where I&#039;ve had support issues escalated and never heard back from them again.

Not that anybody cares about this, I&#039;m sure...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like the Novell conference I used to attend every year (Brainshare) although I never asked any of the females about their marital status. <img src='http://negative99.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;m not an Adobe user, but I get to repackage their apps every year for campus distribution and I have two complaints (no, three):<br />
1. Adobe is the undisputed king of bloatware. Even MS takes second place.<br />
2. Their apps are extremely unfriendly to those of us who have to do &#8220;enterprise installs&#8221;, although to their credit, that&#8217;s begun to change a bit with CS3. They&#8217;re finally beginning to allow XML scripted silent installs and with a little tweaking I can even swap out keyed versions of the actual .exe&#8217;s in the installer.<br />
3. their tech support, though not the worst, is also far from being the best. I&#8217;ve had at least two instances in the past few months where I&#8217;ve had support issues escalated and never heard back from them again.</p>
<p>Not that anybody cares about this, I&#8217;m sure&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

